County board sends ICE resolution to committee

The Clark County Board of Supervisors has pushed the pause button on a resolution that would urge local officials to cooperate with federal immigration authorities.

At its meeting last Thursday, the board voted 20-8 to send the resolution to the law enforcement and emergency management committee for further review. Supervisors voting against sending the resolution to committee were Brandon Hasz, Leonard Stoecker, Doris Bakker, Fritz Garbisch, Fred Schindler, Scott Jalling, Al Bower, and Luke Smith. Kathy Brodhagen from District 1, which includes over half of the city of Abbotsford, abstained.

The resolution does not change county ordinances or any existing law. If passed, it would be a formal show of support by Clark County government, indicating that the county intends to collaborate and cooperate with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in its directives, including the arrest of illegal immigrants.

“Be it resolved that the Clark County Board of Supervisors hereby supports and exhorts all aspects of Clark County government, including but not limited to the Clark County Sheriff’s Office, county agencies and departments, and local law enforcement agencies, to fully cooperate with any lawful requests of federal authorities, including ICE, in the enforcement of immigration laws within Clark County, unless otherwise prohibited by law,” the resolution states.

The resolution was submitted by Brandon Hasz, who is the supervisor for the Town of Fremont Ward 1 and Town of Lynn Ward 1.

The next law enforcement and emergency management committee meeting, at which the resolution will likely be discussed, is scheduled for Sept. 8 at 1:30 p.m. in Room 309 of the Clark County Courthouse, 517 Court St., Neillsville. The meeting is open to the public.

The agenda for that meeting has not been released yet.

Resolution raises concerns Several members of the public, including a few from the Abbotsford-Colby area, urged the board to allow the committee to review the language of Hasz’s four-page resolution so that it doesn’t create unwarranted fear among the local immigrant population.

“The last thing I would want to see is some unintended consequences,” said Ryan Bargender, superintendent of the Abbotsford School District, where a majority of the students are Hispanic.

Brian Haines, a lifelong resident of Colby, said he has seen firsthand how the immigrant population has grown since he was in school and there were no Hispanic students. Through their ministry at the Hope Center in Abbotsford, Haines said and he and his wife have worked closely with a lot of immigrants, many of whom didn’t even realize they were violating the law when they crossed the border.

“By far, the vast majority of these people are beautiful, hard-working people,” he said.

Please see ICE resolution, page 10 At the same time, however, he said even law-abiding immigrants were “full of fear” when President Trump took office again in January, and many were afraid to even leave their houses. He worries that a significant number of these immigrants would leave the area if the county board passed the resolution as is.

“The economic impact on Colby and Abbotsford will be very detrimental,” he said, noting the number of stores and businesses that rely on Hispanics as customers, workers and owners.

Supervisor Hasz, however, said he received a letter of support for his resolution from Colby-Abbotsford Police Chief Alex Bowman, who said his department will always assist a federal agency, whether it’s ICE, the FBI, or the DEA (Drug Enforcement Administration).

Rep. Karen Hurd (R-Thorp) urged the board to reconsider the language of the resolution in light of Assembly Bill 24, which would require sheriffs to “request proof of legal residence status from anyone held in a county jail for an offense punishable as a felony.” It would also direct sheriffs to comply with any detainers or administrative warrants issued by the Department of Homeland Security.

“We’re just interested in getting criminals off the street,” she said. “We don’t want them in our country. I don’t think anyone here wants somebody that’s done a felony crime here.”

Rep. Hurd, however, also noted that a law passed in the 1990s requires all undocumented immigrants to obtain a tax identification number to ensure they are paying income and Social Security taxes.

“They pay all the taxes that every other citizen pays,” she said, noting that undocumented males 18 or over are also required to register for the draft.

President Trump has assured the Wisconsin legislature that he is going “to provide a path forward for undocumented individuals who have not committed any crimes,” Hurd said, noting that crossing the border is a civil offense, not a criminal one.

Given the president’s position, Hurd said she worries the language of the proposed resolution is “a bit nebulous” and may lead to undocumented immigrants being targeted even though they haven’t committed any criminal offenses.

Hasz pushed back on Hurd’s characterization of his resolution.

“I don’t believe the language here is terribly vague at all,” he said. “What it does specifically say is that we will fully cooperate with any lawful request of federal authorities, including ICE.”

Immigrants speak out Tony Gonzalez, director of HOLA (Healthy Opportunities for Latin Americans) — a nonprofit helping provide central Wisconsin Latinos access to healthcare, community services, and legal resources — said he served in the U.S. military under President Reagan, but he now feels at risk of being detained by ICE or deported decades later.

“I can’t believe that today I have to walk around with my passport just to make sure that I don’t accidentally get picked up,” he said.

Gonzalez said most immigrants support a secure border and reforms to the immigration system so that only legal immigrants can work here, but he worries that the resolution would lead to racial profiling and potential violations of Fourth Amendment rights if permanent residents or citizens are picked up by ICE.

With birth rates declining, Gonzalez said the United States and Clark County in particular depends on immigrants to fill job openings.

“We don’t have workers in this county, and not everyone that’s brown is a criminal,” he said.

Alejandro Vasquez said he has lived in Clark County for more than 20 years, and most of the immigrants here are working long days and contributing to the community — which may not be the same in other parts of the United States.

“We’re talking about Clark County, not the entire country,” he said.

Supervisors in support Besides Hasz, two other supervisors spoke in favor adopting the resolution as is, without referring it to committee for possible changes.

Supervisor Leonard Stoecker, who represents rural Loyal and parts of the towns of Sherman and York, said the resolution is nothing more than a directive to follow lawful requests made by the federal government.

“It’s not telling anybody to go out and arrest anybody or any of those kinds of things,” he said. “We’re supporting the United States of America in their efforts and we’re verbalizing that.”

Stoecker later said the resolution “shouldn’t be necessary,” but because of past presidential administrations’ inaction on illegal immigration, the county needs to shoulder its share of the weight to fix the problem.

Supervisor Fred Schindler, who represents Curtiss and the area between Colby and Dorchester, said he agrees with Stoecker that a resolution is just reinforcing the county’s obligation to uphold the laws as written.

“We took an oath a year ago in April to uphold the United States Constitution, the State of Wisconsin Constitution to the best of our ability so help me God,” he said. “This is nothing more than a friendly reminder that we need to do what is proper.”

Editor Valorie Brecht contributed to this report.