recordgleaner
Posted on

School Districts of Loyal and GreenwoodConsolidation FAQ pages Advisory Referendum - recordgleaner_20250326_trg-2025-03-26-0-011_art_0.xml

Advisory Referendum
recordgleaner_20250326_trg-2025-03-26-0-011_art_0.xml
Learn More School Districts of Loyal and Greenwood CALL Chris Lindner at 715.255.8552 EMAIL chrislindner@loyal.k12.wi.us VISIT www.loyal.k12.wi.us FACEBOOK @ loyalschools CALL Joe Green at 715.267.6101 EMAIL jogreen@greenwood.k12.wi.us VISIT www.greenwood.k12.wi.us FACEBOOK @ greenwoodwi LOYAL | G REENWOOD Consolidation FAQ pages This advisory question is to gauge the public’s support for consolidation. It is not binding, but instead a guide for our boards to move forward. Most of these questions have been answered elsewhere in this FAQ page and I would also refer you to the fact sheet on the district website. Advisory Referendum INFORMATION Advisory Referendum INFORMATION 166538 1. See Question 3 2. There has been no discussion of closing any buildings. 3. See Question 2 4. See Questions 5, 8, and 18 What Will be on the Ballot? What Will be on the Ballot? Why Both improve we Why Both improve we DECLINING On April 1, 2025, a non-binding advisory question will appear on the ballot, asking residents whether they support the consolidation of Loyal and Greenwood School Districts. This advisory vote will not make the final decision but will provide valuable direction to the school boards as they determine the best course of action for the future of their schools. Both Loyal and Greenwood School Districts are committed to: On April 1, 2025, a non-binding advisory question will appear on the ballot, asking residents whether they support the consolidation of Loyal and Greenwood School Districts. This advisory vote will not make the final decision but will provide valuable direction to the school boards as they determine the best course of action for the future of their schools. Both Loyal and Greenwood School Districts are committed to: DECLINING ƒ ƒ Fewer facilities. ƒ ƒ Consolidation athletic INCREASING INCREASING ƒ ƒ Ensuring a sustainable future for their schools. Ensuring a sustainable future for their schools. Continuing to provide safe and positive opportunities for students. Continuing to provide safe and positive opportunities for students. Maintaining high levels of learning, achievement, and increased opportunities. Maintaining high levels of learning, achievement, and increased opportunities. Working within budgets acceptable to their communities. Working within budgets acceptable to their communities. ƒ Rising ƒ A reinvested OUTDATED OUTDATED Consolidation FAQs continued from page 10 Question 20: Why was this document that is very biased toward consolidation put out without any approval or input from our school board? Many of the ”facts” on the document are just opinions from the two school administrators who are clearly using any avenue to sway the vote and public opinion. The fact sheet is information about the question of consolidation between the two districts. The fact sheet was shared with both boards prior to posting on district websites. Because the question on the ballot asks voters if they support the consolidation of two districts, the information fact sheet shares facts about consolidation and why it is a consideration. If the majority vote comes back “no” in either district, the districts will continue to explore other means of sustainability. These means would include: •Continue collaboration between the two districts and possibly other districts with programs and staff. •Each district will need to continue to pass operating referendums, which will likely not be less than what each district has in place through the 2027-28 school year. The only way to reduce the amount of operational referendum needs is to cut programs and positions. Question 21: This high school is set up to handle all 12 grades. Why is it so hard to just say the main school will be in Loyal. The gym in Greenwood is smaller; their elementary is in a totally different building. I would think putting everyone in one building would be a better cost efficient choice. Refer to Question 3 Question 22: The two- and three- building Baird consolidation studies showed both districts going into progressive budget deficits if combined as is. The only ways to save them are to go to a one-building scenario or cut staff. So if we are not putting all students in one school in Loyal then why would Loyal residents take the risk of possibly losing our school when we could decrease staff through attrition and collaborate to share staff with Greenwood, Granton, and possibly Owen?? The facts surrounding the budget that we know are that both districts require operational referendum dollars to operate the way they currently do. Without operational referendum dollars, both districts would go bankrupt within a year or two. The options for either district to be sustainable are to continue passing operational referendums, which will likely continue to increase (see referendum history question 9) or cut staff and programs. With each district relying on over $1.5 million dollars in local taxpayer dollars, those cuts would be deep and have an impact on programs. Refer to question 2 that outlines the continued need for operational referendum dollars in a consolidated district, but a much lower amount as several efficiencies can be captured. Even in a consolidated district, it would be beneficial to work with other neighbors to share resources and find other more efficient ways to educate our kids. Refer to question 3 about school locations. Question 23: What are the potentially negative consequences of consolidation and why do schools often try many other measures prior to consolidation? The school districts will leave it up to the residents to determine the positives and negatives of a consolidated district. These FAQ pages are designed to share facts about consolidation between the two districts and answer questions about a potential consolidation. We are unable to speak to the reasons other districts have or have not consolidated. What we know about our two districts is that the proximity, zero debt, and a similar mill rate make consolidation an option to consider. Question 24: What happens if this fails, and Greenwood goes with a different school for a merged school district? 10-20 years down the road when we can’t pass a referendum, would Loyal have to give up everything and join that already created new entity? If we have no other viable options to merge with then? If Loyal and Greenwood decide against consolidation, both districts would need to continue relying on local tax dollars through operational referendum. This need will likely increase. Both districts would be bankrupt within 1-2 years without referendum dollars or significant cuts to staff and programs. There are just too many scenarios to speculate what could happen in 10-20 years. Question 25: How long can either district feasibly continue to pass a referendum to stay open, if this fails? Looking at prior votes, Greenwood has very positive support for the school; Loyal traditionally does not. The history of referendums in both districts is shared in Question 9. It would be hard to predict if either district could continue to pass an operational referendum, but it is fairly clear that both districts would continue to ask for more in order to maintain current operations and programming. Question 26: Would a larger pool of district residences cause taxes to go down, if we do merge? There are several factors that need to be considered in a consolidation regarding taxes. Many districts are not debt free like Loyal and Greenwood are. If other districts were part of a consolidation, their debt would then become the debt of the consolidated district. This could have a negative impact on mill rate. Other items that can affect taxes from adding other districts include per pupil funding, equalization aid, special education needs and funding, and fund balance. An operational referendum would also be spread across all residents in the consolidated district, but the needed amount would also depend on those previously listed items. Question 27: Why or why not would businesses leave, and/or not come into town, if the districts merge? Our districts would not be able to comment on why businesses would or would not leave or why some have already closed. We can look at historical data and see that some businesses have closed in both towns and some businesses have opened in both towns while being separate districts. Both administrators have met and will continue to meet with the Clark County Economic Development director to talk about ways to strengthen opportunities in both districts. Question 28: 1. Where will the kids attend school? If Consolidation is Supported: Next Steps If Consolidation is Supported: Next Steps ƒ ƒ The districts. ƒ ƒ Combining If the vote is in favor, the Boards will begin further exploration of consolidation, including creating a timeline for implementation. If consolidation is approved, the earliest the districts could consolidate is the 2028–2029 school year. If the vote is in favor, the Boards will begin further exploration of consolidation, including creating a timeline for implementation. If consolidation is approved, the earliest the districts could consolidate is the 2028–2029 school year. Question 29: Since both districts are currently partnered with different technical schools, in a combined district would dual credit courses be offered through CVTC or NTC? Through a conversation with the president of the Wisconsin Technical College System, we have learned that the taxing districts would likely not change due to consolidation. Therefore, all students would have access to both technical college opportunities. There are pieces from both NTC and CVTC that would be beneficial to all students. Also, this has sparked conversation about opening these doors sooner! Question 30: You people can’t get the sports figured out. Where's the school going to be? That would be good to know ahead of time. Which administrator is going to give up their job? Refer to question 6 for a list co-op athletics and other shared programs/services. Refer to question 3. In a consolidated district, it is possible for both high schools to operate as they do now while still capturing significant savings from duplicative positions. The consolidated board would have to decide how to move forward with the district administrator position. Question 31: If the school districts were to remain separate and IF they were to each continue passing operational referendums, how long could each district survive without going bankrupt? (Using current enrollment projections and the funding data you have available.) If the districts continue to pass operational referendums, they would not go bankrupt. Operational referendum needs will continue to increase in order to keep up with expenses and needs, while enrollment continues to decline. Students are one of our main sources of revenue and with that number continuing to decline, revenue will continue to decline. The trend of higher needs and expenses would continue to increase, which would continue to drive the operational referendum needs higher. Consolidation is a way to keep our schools operating the way they are while lowering operational costs through elimination of duplicative positions. These savings could be greater than $1 million. If operational referendums do not pass, there will be significant reductions in staff and activities. Both districts would only be able to survive as far as their fund balance takes them — one to two years. Question 32: Will a school close if we consolidate? Some people in Loyal are saying a yes vote is a vote to close our school. Upon consolidation, no school would have to close in either community. Operation, as it is today, could continue. Savings from the elimination of duplicative positions would save significant dollars, thus, lowering the overall need for operational referendum dollars. There will still be a need for an operational referendum, but the amount needed would be lower than it currently is in both districts. The operation of the consolidated district could stay as-is until the new consolidated district, and its residents, decided that changes to the operation need to be made in order to stay effective and efficient with taxpayer dollars. This could last for years. Question 33: What is the potential timeline for consolidation? April 1, 2025 — advisory vote (non-binding) April 2, 2025-Nov. 3, 2026 — planning for consolidation by our current joint board Nov. 3, 2026 — potential binding referendum vote to consolidate December 2026 regular board meetings — resolutions approved by both boards to consolidate; interim board formed by combining both district boards; work on aligning policies, handbooks, compensation; work on streamlining budgets, payroll, student information systems July 1, 2028 — start of consolidated district 2028-2029 school year — begins as a consolidated district — operate how we are now November 2028 — operational referendum on ballot; begin strategic planning with community involvement; continue operating with schools in both districts (two separate schools in one district) Question 34: Please list all the duplicative positions you could eliminate if schools consolidate but no actual school buildings are closed. And please explain why we would even consolidate at all then, because if you cut staff/duplicative positions, we could simply collaborate and share staff. There are a number of duplicative positions between both districts, one of which is the district administrator. After an approved resolution to consolidate, the joint board will be able to look at the efficiencies that a consolidated district will need to run smoothly. This will likely include new board members, as there are two board elections between now and December 2026, when a potential resolution could be passed. Positions beyond the district administrator would only be speculation at this point. However, there are many other duplicative items that would allow significant cost savings in a consolidated district. They cannot be eliminated without consolidation as each district would need them. These include contracts with vendors such as CESA 10, software licenses, technology support, distance learning, website host fees, athletic and co-curricular costs, to name a few. For example, both districts spend over $300,000 on CESA services. These could be streamlined in a consolidated district. Question 35: How does consolidation create more opportunities for our students? There are many ways to increase opportunities for our students in a consolidated district. Both districts have classes at the high school level with small numbers. By combining classes, this opens a slot for a teacher to offer an additional course or section. Many times, this could include new dual credit/AP courses. For example, if both districts are teaching a calculus course for 5-7 students, combining that group would allow one math teacher to offer a different course. In our career and technical education area, a consolidated district would allow teachers to focus on their areas of strength and offer higher level courses in those areas. A consolidated district would open the door for students to take courses from NTC or CVTC. At the elementary level, a consolidated district would allow greater collaboration among staff and a stronger network of peers for our students to learn and grow with, academically and socially. ENHANCED ENHANCED ƒ ƒ A courses, services ƒ ƒ Combining participation of LONG- LONG- ƒ ƒ Without facilities. education ƒ A state ƒ Note: Questions about facilities, mascots, locations, and colors will only be addressed after a consolidation decision is made. Note: Questions about facilities, mascots, locations, and colors will only be addressed after a consolidation decision is made. IMPACT If Consolidation is NOT Supported: Next Steps If Consolidation is NOT Supported: Next Steps If the community does not support consolidation, the Districts will explore other avenues to achieve sustainability. Both Districts would continue to rely on growing operational referendum dollars to sustain current operation and programming. If the community does not support consolidation, the Districts will explore other avenues to achieve sustainability. Both Districts would continue to rely on growing operational referendum dollars to sustain current operation and programming. 2. What will happen to the building/buildings not being used? 3. Will there be a cost saving or increase? 4. What will the staffing situation look like? While this their consolidation are expire The likely staff, licenses, operational Learn More Learn More CALL Joe Green at 715.267.6101 EMAIL jogreen@greenwood.k12.wi.us VISIT www.greenwood.k12.wi.us CALL Chris Lindner at 715.255.8552 EMAIL chrislindner@loyal.k12.wi.us VISIT www.loyal.k12.wi.us FACEBOOK @ loyalschools CALL Chris Lindner at 715.255.8552 EMAIL chrislindner@loyal.k12.wi.us VISIT www.loyal.k12.wi.us FACEBOOK @ loyalschools CALL Joe Green at 715.267.6101 EMAIL jogreen@greenwood.k12.wi.us VISIT www.greenwood.k12.wi.us FACEBOOK @ greenwoodwi LOYAL | G REENWOOD LOYAL | G REENWOOD FACEBOOK @ greenwoodwi
recordgleaner_20250326_trg-2025-03-26-0-011_art_0.xml
Learn More School Districts of Loyal and Greenwood CALL Chris Lindner at 715.255.8552 EMAIL chrislindner@loyal.k12.wi.us VISIT www.loyal.k12.wi.us FACEBOOK @ loyalschools CALL Joe Green at 715.267.6101 EMAIL jogreen@greenwood.k12.wi.us VISIT www.greenwood.k12.wi.us FACEBOOK @ greenwoodwi LOYAL | G REENWOOD Consolidation FAQ pages This advisory question is to gauge the public’s support for consolidation. It is not binding, but instead a guide for our boards to move forward. Most of these questions have been answered elsewhere in this FAQ page and I would also refer you to the fact sheet on the district website. Advisory Referendum INFORMATION Advisory Referendum INFORMATION 166538 1. See Question 3 2. There has been no discussion of closing any buildings. 3. See Question 2 4. See Questions 5, 8, and 18 What Will be on the Ballot? What Will be on the Ballot? Why Both improve we Why Both improve we DECLINING On April 1, 2025, a non-binding advisory question will appear on the ballot, asking residents whether they support the consolidation of Loyal and Greenwood School Districts. This advisory vote will not make the final decision but will provide valuable direction to the school boards as they determine the best course of action for the future of their schools. Both Loyal and Greenwood School Districts are committed to: On April 1, 2025, a non-binding advisory question will appear on the ballot, asking residents whether they support the consolidation of Loyal and Greenwood School Districts. This advisory vote will not make the final decision but will provide valuable direction to the school boards as they determine the best course of action for the future of their schools. Both Loyal and Greenwood School Districts are committed to: DECLINING ƒ ƒ Fewer facilities. ƒ ƒ Consolidation athletic INCREASING INCREASING ƒ ƒ Ensuring a sustainable future for their schools. Ensuring a sustainable future for their schools. Continuing to provide safe and positive opportunities for students. Continuing to provide safe and positive opportunities for students. Maintaining high levels of learning, achievement, and increased opportunities. Maintaining high levels of learning, achievement, and increased opportunities. Working within budgets acceptable to their communities. Working within budgets acceptable to their communities. ƒ Rising ƒ A reinvested OUTDATED OUTDATED Consolidation FAQs continued from page 10 Question 20: Why was this document that is very biased toward consolidation put out without any approval or input from our school board? Many of the ”facts” on the document are just opinions from the two school administrators who are clearly using any avenue to sway the vote and public opinion. The fact sheet is information about the question of consolidation between the two districts. The fact sheet was shared with both boards prior to posting on district websites. Because the question on the ballot asks voters if they support the consolidation of two districts, the information fact sheet shares facts about consolidation and why it is a consideration. If the majority vote comes back “no” in either district, the districts will continue to explore other means of sustainability. These means would include: •Continue collaboration between the two districts and possibly other districts with programs and staff. •Each district will need to continue to pass operating referendums, which will likely not be less than what each district has in place through the 2027-28 school year. The only way to reduce the amount of operational referendum needs is to cut programs and positions. Question 21: This high school is set up to handle all 12 grades. Why is it so hard to just say the main school will be in Loyal. The gym in Greenwood is smaller; their elementary is in a totally different building. I would think putting everyone in one building would be a better cost efficient choice. Refer to Question 3 Question 22: The two- and three- building Baird consolidation studies showed both districts going into progressive budget deficits if combined as is. The only ways to save them are to go to a one-building scenario or cut staff. So if we are not putting all students in one school in Loyal then why would Loyal residents take the risk of possibly losing our school when we could decrease staff through attrition and collaborate to share staff with Greenwood, Granton, and possibly Owen?? The facts surrounding the budget that we know are that both districts require operational referendum dollars to operate the way they currently do. Without operational referendum dollars, both districts would go bankrupt within a year or two. The options for either district to be sustainable are to continue passing operational referendums, which will likely continue to increase (see referendum history question 9) or cut staff and programs. With each district relying on over $1.5 million dollars in local taxpayer dollars, those cuts would be deep and have an impact on programs. Refer to question 2 that outlines the continued need for operational referendum dollars in a consolidated district, but a much lower amount as several efficiencies can be captured. Even in a consolidated district, it would be beneficial to work with other neighbors to share resources and find other more efficient ways to educate our kids. Refer to question 3 about school locations. Question 23: What are the potentially negative consequences of consolidation and why do schools often try many other measures prior to consolidation? The school districts will leave it up to the residents to determine the positives and negatives of a consolidated district. These FAQ pages are designed to share facts about consolidation between the two districts and answer questions about a potential consolidation. We are unable to speak to the reasons other districts have or have not consolidated. What we know about our two districts is that the proximity, zero debt, and a similar mill rate make consolidation an option to consider. Question 24: What happens if this fails, and Greenwood goes with a different school for a merged school district? 10-20 years down the road when we can’t pass a referendum, would Loyal have to give up everything and join that already created new entity? If we have no other viable options to merge with then? If Loyal and Greenwood decide against consolidation, both districts would need to continue relying on local tax dollars through operational referendum. This need will likely increase. Both districts would be bankrupt within 1-2 years without referendum dollars or significant cuts to staff and programs. There are just too many scenarios to speculate what could happen in 10-20 years. Question 25: How long can either district feasibly continue to pass a referendum to stay open, if this fails? Looking at prior votes, Greenwood has very positive support for the school; Loyal traditionally does not. The history of referendums in both districts is shared in Question 9. It would be hard to predict if either district could continue to pass an operational referendum, but it is fairly clear that both districts would continue to ask for more in order to maintain current operations and programming. Question 26: Would a larger pool of district residences cause taxes to go down, if we do merge? There are several factors that need to be considered in a consolidation regarding taxes. Many districts are not debt free like Loyal and Greenwood are. If other districts were part of a consolidation, their debt would then become the debt of the consolidated district. This could have a negative impact on mill rate. Other items that can affect taxes from adding other districts include per pupil funding, equalization aid, special education needs and funding, and fund balance. An operational referendum would also be spread across all residents in the consolidated district, but the needed amount would also depend on those previously listed items. Question 27: Why or why not would businesses leave, and/or not come into town, if the districts merge? Our districts would not be able to comment on why businesses would or would not leave or why some have already closed. We can look at historical data and see that some businesses have closed in both towns and some businesses have opened in both towns while being separate districts. Both administrators have met and will continue to meet with the Clark County Economic Development director to talk about ways to strengthen opportunities in both districts. Question 28: 1. Where will the kids attend school? If Consolidation is Supported: Next Steps If Consolidation is Supported: Next Steps ƒ ƒ The districts. ƒ ƒ Combining If the vote is in favor, the Boards will begin further exploration of consolidation, including creating a timeline for implementation. If consolidation is approved, the earliest the districts could consolidate is the 2028–2029 school year. If the vote is in favor, the Boards will begin further exploration of consolidation, including creating a timeline for implementation. If consolidation is approved, the earliest the districts could consolidate is the 2028–2029 school year. Question 29: Since both districts are currently partnered with different technical schools, in a combined district would dual credit courses be offered through CVTC or NTC? Through a conversation with the president of the Wisconsin Technical College System, we have learned that the taxing districts would likely not change due to consolidation. Therefore, all students would have access to both technical college opportunities. There are pieces from both NTC and CVTC that would be beneficial to all students. Also, this has sparked conversation about opening these doors sooner! Question 30: You people can’t get the sports figured out. Where's the school going to be? That would be good to know ahead of time. Which administrator is going to give up their job? Refer to question 6 for a list co-op athletics and other shared programs/services. Refer to question 3. In a consolidated district, it is possible for both high schools to operate as they do now while still capturing significant savings from duplicative positions. The consolidated board would have to decide how to move forward with the district administrator position. Question 31: If the school districts were to remain separate and IF they were to each continue passing operational referendums, how long could each district survive without going bankrupt? (Using current enrollment projections and the funding data you have available.) If the districts continue to pass operational referendums, they would not go bankrupt. Operational referendum needs will continue to increase in order to keep up with expenses and needs, while enrollment continues to decline. Students are one of our main sources of revenue and with that number continuing to decline, revenue will continue to decline. The trend of higher needs and expenses would continue to increase, which would continue to drive the operational referendum needs higher. Consolidation is a way to keep our schools operating the way they are while lowering operational costs through elimination of duplicative positions. These savings could be greater than $1 million. If operational referendums do not pass, there will be significant reductions in staff and activities. Both districts would only be able to survive as far as their fund balance takes them — one to two years. Question 32: Will a school close if we consolidate? Some people in Loyal are saying a yes vote is a vote to close our school. Upon consolidation, no school would have to close in either community. Operation, as it is today, could continue. Savings from the elimination of duplicative positions would save significant dollars, thus, lowering the overall need for operational referendum dollars. There will still be a need for an operational referendum, but the amount needed would be lower than it currently is in both districts. The operation of the consolidated district could stay as-is until the new consolidated district, and its residents, decided that changes to the operation need to be made in order to stay effective and efficient with taxpayer dollars. This could last for years. Question 33: What is the potential timeline for consolidation? April 1, 2025 — advisory vote (non-binding) April 2, 2025-Nov. 3, 2026 — planning for consolidation by our current joint board Nov. 3, 2026 — potential binding referendum vote to consolidate December 2026 regular board meetings — resolutions approved by both boards to consolidate; interim board formed by combining both district boards; work on aligning policies, handbooks, compensation; work on streamlining budgets, payroll, student information systems July 1, 2028 — start of consolidated district 2028-2029 school year — begins as a consolidated district — operate how we are now November 2028 — operational referendum on ballot; begin strategic planning with community involvement; continue operating with schools in both districts (two separate schools in one district) Question 34: Please list all the duplicative positions you could eliminate if schools consolidate but no actual school buildings are closed. And please explain why we would even consolidate at all then, because if you cut staff/duplicative positions, we could simply collaborate and share staff. There are a number of duplicative positions between both districts, one of which is the district administrator. After an approved resolution to consolidate, the joint board will be able to look at the efficiencies that a consolidated district will need to run smoothly. This will likely include new board members, as there are two board elections between now and December 2026, when a potential resolution could be passed. Positions beyond the district administrator would only be speculation at this point. However, there are many other duplicative items that would allow significant cost savings in a consolidated district. They cannot be eliminated without consolidation as each district would need them. These include contracts with vendors such as CESA 10, software licenses, technology support, distance learning, website host fees, athletic and co-curricular costs, to name a few. For example, both districts spend over $300,000 on CESA services. These could be streamlined in a consolidated district. Question 35: How does consolidation create more opportunities for our students? There are many ways to increase opportunities for our students in a consolidated district. Both districts have classes at the high school level with small numbers. By combining classes, this opens a slot for a teacher to offer an additional course or section. Many times, this could include new dual credit/AP courses. For example, if both districts are teaching a calculus course for 5-7 students, combining that group would allow one math teacher to offer a different course. In our career and technical education area, a consolidated district would allow teachers to focus on their areas of strength and offer higher level courses in those areas. A consolidated district would open the door for students to take courses from NTC or CVTC. At the elementary level, a consolidated district would allow greater collaboration among staff and a stronger network of peers for our students to learn and grow with, academically and socially. ENHANCED ENHANCED ƒ ƒ A courses, services ƒ ƒ Combining participation of LONG- LONG- ƒ ƒ Without facilities. education ƒ A state ƒ Note: Questions about facilities, mascots, locations, and colors will only be addressed after a consolidation decision is made. Note: Questions about facilities, mascots, locations, and colors will only be addressed after a consolidation decision is made. IMPACT If Consolidation is NOT Supported: Next Steps If Consolidation is NOT Supported: Next Steps If the community does not support consolidation, the Districts will explore other avenues to achieve sustainability. Both Districts would continue to rely on growing operational referendum dollars to sustain current operation and programming. If the community does not support consolidation, the Districts will explore other avenues to achieve sustainability. Both Districts would continue to rely on growing operational referendum dollars to sustain current operation and programming. 2. What will happen to the building/buildings not being used? 3. Will there be a cost saving or increase? 4. What will the staffing situation look like? While this their consolidation are expire The likely staff, licenses, operational Learn More Learn More CALL Joe Green at 715.267.6101 EMAIL jogreen@greenwood.k12.wi.us VISIT www.greenwood.k12.wi.us CALL Chris Lindner at 715.255.8552 EMAIL chrislindner@loyal.k12.wi.us VISIT www.loyal.k12.wi.us FACEBOOK @ loyalschools CALL Chris Lindner at 715.255.8552 EMAIL chrislindner@loyal.k12.wi.us VISIT www.loyal.k12.wi.us FACEBOOK @ loyalschools CALL Joe Green at 715.267.6101 EMAIL jogreen@greenwood.k12.wi.us VISIT www.greenwood.k12.wi.us FACEBOOK @ greenwoodwi LOYAL | G REENWOOD LOYAL | G REENWOOD FACEBOOK @ greenwoodwi
Read the printed article...
LATEST NEWS