November 19, 2009

Proposed Medford duck feeding ban is a daffy idea

The City of Medford is crying foul over the foulness left by water fowl and is looking at cracking down on those who feed the foul fowl.
The city's comprehensive plan is a pretty hefty document weighing in at about the weight of your average mallard. It includes a lot of really good ideas proposed by citizen volunteers.
The ideas include changing the zoning on the campus woods to conservancy district like the other parks to give residents additional protections for how it is developed and setting goals for addressing long term community needs.
Rather than enacting any of those ideas, the Medford City Council Tuesday night sets its sights on ducks. Or more accurately, the city is taking aim at those nefarious do-gooders who feed the ducks in the city parks. The issue is not so much the ducks and geese but what is left behind when the ducks and geese hang around. Some people have a lot of problems with the waste the waterfowl leave along the pathways and since you can't ticket a goose for illegal dumping, the solution instead is to cut the flow off at the source.
If Alderman Mike Riggle, who is a veterinarian in his day job, has his way, the city police department would be out ticketing grandmas and small children for contributing to what he perceives as a duck and goose overpopulation problem. This is just plain daffy and even Riggle rightfully predicts the idea will go over as something akin to trying to ban the eating of apple pie and the flying of flags.
Medford police officers have far more important things to do than to harass people using the parks and feeding crusts of bread or even buckets of corn to some ducks in the pond.
A feeding ban is one solution to a perceived duck overpopulation problem and it is interesting to note citizens who served on the planning subcommittee did not consider a ban as a practical option.
Fortunately, some on council opposed the idea and instead proposed a compromise where the city would spend several hundred dollars to post signs along the Riverwalk nicely asking people not to feed the waterfowl. Having seen drivers go in the ditch to drive around an officer stopping traffic for a community event, the likelihood of having the signs do any good is slim.
If a feeding ban is not the solution then what is? In the past the resident duck population was ruled to be so interbred with domestic ducks dumped at the park they were no longer considered wild. Perhaps it is time for the city to cull the duck population in the park either through the introduction of additional predators such as snapping turtles, mink or fisher to the parks or through the active removal of duck populations in a humane manner.
Rather than criminalizing kids and grandparents for connecting with wildlife, the city should instead be looking at some bigger issues facing the community such as ways to promote community growth or making the community more friendly for people to move here.

Read recent editorials

November 12

November 5

October 29

October 22

October 15

October 8

October 1
September 24
September 17
September 10
September 3
August 27
August 20
August 13
August 6
July 30
July 23
July 16
July 9
July 2
June 25
June 18
June 11
June 4
May 21
May 14
May 7
April 30
April 23
April 16
April 9
April 2
March 26, 2009
March 19, 2009
March 12 2009
March 5, 2009
February 26, 2009
February 19, 2009
February 12, 2009
February 5, 2009
January 29, 2009
January 22, 2009
January 15, 2009
January 8, 2009
December 25, 2008
December 18, 2008
December 11, 2008
December 4, 2008
November 27, 2008